[Bug c++/104282] Copy elision when initializing a base-class subobject with aggregate initialization

2024-03-22 Thread fchelnokov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104282 --- Comment #8 from Fedor Chelnokov --- One more inconsistency here: struct A { A() {} A(A&&) = delete; }; struct B : A { }; int main() { // ok in GCC B{ A{} }; // error in GCC B b{ A{} }; } GCC allows temporary creatio

[Bug c++/104282] Copy elision when initializing a base-class subobject with aggregate initialization

2023-01-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104282 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > I think there's any existing bug about this, and it's an open issue in the > ABI PR 98995 .

[Bug c++/104282] Copy elision when initializing a base-class subobject with aggregate initialization

2022-01-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104282 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#2403

[Bug c++/104282] Copy elision when initializing a base-class subobject with aggregate initialization

2022-01-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104282 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Related to https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/107

[Bug c++/104282] Copy elision when initializing a base-class subobject with aggregate initialization

2022-01-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104282 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think there's any existing bug about this, and it's an open issue in the ABI

[Bug c++/104282] Copy elision when initializing a base-class subobject with aggregate initialization

2022-01-29 Thread fchelnokov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104282 --- Comment #3 from Fedor Chelnokov --- Both Clang and GCC do not change their output either with `-std=c++20` or with `-std=c++17` options. And both reject the program with -std=c++14`.

[Bug c++/104282] Copy elision when initializing a base-class subobject with aggregate initialization

2022-01-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104282 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- That is c++17 requires Copy elision here while c++14 does not.

[Bug c++/104282] Copy elision when initializing a base-class subobject with aggregate initialization

2022-01-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104282 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Gcc 12 defaults to c++17. I have not looked but I suspect that is the difference.