https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105644
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hlewin at gmx dot de
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105644
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105644
--- Comment #2 from Namniav ---
Now Clang also crashes on the original
example(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64607), although its cause
may be different to GCC's.
I can't remember why I used `get` instead of `std::get` in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105644
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105644
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
The original code is valid (accepted) by clang. But it's hard to reduce it as
clang++ does not accept's gcc's -E output and vice versa :/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105644
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
