--- Comment #28 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-08 20:29
---
*** Bug 34309 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #27 from loban dot rahman at gmail dot com 2007-01-27 03:32
---
Would it be possible to backport this fix to the 4.1 tree? It would prove very,
very useful.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10591
--- Comment #26 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-14 16:01
---
*** Bug 29085 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #25 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-05 03:01
---
Fixed for 4.2.0.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #24 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-30 21:30 ---
Did my recent visibility patch fix this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10591
--- Comment #23 from geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-07 00:55 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
The PCH problem with get_file_function_name is independent of the question of
giving anonymous namespace members internal linkage. We still need to give
them distinct names; we are
--- Comment #22 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-05 22:26 ---
The PCH problem with get_file_function_name is independent of the question of
giving anonymous namespace members internal linkage. We still need to give
them distinct names; we are giving up on address comparison of
