https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108761
--- Comment #7 from Paul Robinson
---
Okay. I'm persuaded this is not a great idea, and I'll solve the customer's
problem another way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108761
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Paul Robinson from comment #5)
> Modifying the syntax of the attribute won't help users who are importing
> code from a third party, but still want to do dead-stripping/deduplication.
And it mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108761
--- Comment #5 from Paul Robinson
---
Modifying the syntax of the attribute won't help users who are importing
code from a third party, but still want to do dead-stripping/deduplication.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108761
Paul Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul_robinson at playstation
dot s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108761
--- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song ---
New syntax setting the flags will be useful. Also, currently there is no way to
customize the section type.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108761
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I think rather section should have a secondary argument which mark as
> needing to append the function name on it ...
s/function name/decl assembly name/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108761
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think an option would be the wrong appoarch because many of the times, you
are marking a variable inside a section exactly because you want it to be part
of an "array".
I think rather section should have
