https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116943
mauro russo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116943
--- Comment #3 from mauro russo ---
may I suppose that the following text from [temp.inst]:
The implicit instantiation of a class template specialization causes
- the implicit instantiation of the declarations, but not of the definitions,
of th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116943
--- Comment #2 from mauro russo ---
thank you Andrew Pinski,
do you have also any explanation from the standard, why it should be rejected ?
That is, where the instantiation comes on ?
Or why this does not implicitly contradicts the option to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116943
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang, MSVC and EDG all reject the code for the same reason.
