--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-22
21:02 ---
Please file a new bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-22 20:51
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] C++ debug is broken
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-07-22 20:45
> ---
> The bug came back with the patch for bug 2
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-07-22 20:50 ---
Now, I got the same failure on Linux/ia32, Linux/ia64 and Linux/x86_64. Mark,
please make sure you have the current binutils. I think binutils 2.16.1 should
be enough to see the bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-07-22 20:45 ---
The bug came back with the patch for bug 21828.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-25
17:12 ---
Subject: Bug 18556
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-25 17:11:37
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog c-common.c c-common.h c-typ
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-25
17:41 ---
Fixed in 4.0.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLV
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-11-19 23:39 ---
The symptom is that debug information references the symbol which is omittted.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18556
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-19 22:54
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] C++ debug is broken
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-11-19 22:50
> ---
> Does this patch
>
> --- toplev.c.bar
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-11-19 22:50 ---
Does this patch
--- toplev.c.bar2004-11-16 10:13:18.0 -0800
+++ toplev.c2004-11-19 14:50:09.493493596 -0800
@@ -818,6 +818,13 @@ check_global_declarations (tree *vec, in
for (i = 0; i < len; i++
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-11-19 01:42 ---
I have verified that
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg00970.html
is the cause.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18556
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-11-19 00:34 ---
Please check out g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh53.C. I got
[EMAIL PROTECTED] testsuite]$ /usr/gcc-4.0/bin/g++
/net/gnu/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh53.C -g -c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] testsuite]$
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-18
22:44 ---
I will need a preprocessed test case and command-line.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18556
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-18
22:41 ---
The only change between the 11 and the 13 which makes sense at even having an
effect:
2004-11-12 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/18416
* passes.c (rest_of_decl_compilation): Do n
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-18
22:36 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-11/msg00581.html is also broken.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
15 matches
Mail list logo
