--- Additional Comments From scp at predict dot com 2005-07-06 21:47
---
(In reply to comment #9)
the bug is not a regression, so it has not gone into 4.0. As there seems to
be
a need for it, and the patch is small, we could probably do it. Right now 4.0
is frozen for 4.0.1
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-05
15:40 ---
This is OK for 4.0.2, once the branch re-opens.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20746
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-01
11:39 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
This fix has not made it to the gcc_4_0 branch, and the problem still exists
in
gcc4.0.0. It is trivially recreated using the same test code:
the bug is not a regression, so it
--- Additional Comments From scp at predict dot com 2005-06-30 21:00
---
This fix has not made it to the gcc_4_0 branch, and the problem still exists in
gcc4.0.0. It is trivially recreated using the same test code:
gcc -v -o cv cv.cpp -lstdc++
Reading specs from
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-22
05:10 ---
*** Bug 18098 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-04
14:26 ---
*** Bug 20747 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20746
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-04
14:35 ---
Test from 20747:
extern C void *printf(char * ...);
class A {
public:
virtual void f();
virtual A* i();
virtual void j();
int a;
};
class B {
public:
virtual void f();
virtual void g();
virtual B* l();
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-04
14:38 ---
Confirmed, not a regression.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |nathan at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-04
17:24 ---
2005-04-04 Nathan Sidwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR c++/20746
* method.c (use_thunk): Protect covariant pointer return
adjustments from NULL pointers.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From yanliu at ca dot ibm dot com 2005-04-04 17:37
---
Could you tell me which gcc level has the fix? thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20746
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20746
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-04
17:45 ---
Subject: Bug 20746
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-04 17:45:17
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog method.c
13 matches
Mail list logo
