--- Additional Comments From sven at clio dot in-berlin dot de 2005-05-14
08:37 ---
After reflection I changed the subject. While template declaration and partial
specialization is possible inside a class, the full specialzation is not.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-14
17:06 ---
I don't think full specializations are not allowed in side classes but I don't
have my copy of the standard
in front of me.
Also note ICC also rejects this code:
t.cc(28): error: class "container::iterato
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-15
11:21 ---
>From 14.7.2 [temp.expl.spec] paragraph 2:
An explicit specialization shall be declared in the namespace of which the
template is a member,
or, for member templates, in the namespace of which the enclos
--- Additional Comments From sven at clio dot in-berlin dot de 2005-05-15
14:03 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> From 14.7.2 [temp.expl.spec] paragraph 2:
> An explicit specialization shall be declared in the namespace of which the
> template is a member,
> or, for member templ
--- Additional Comments From sven at clio dot in-berlin dot de 2005-05-15
14:43 ---
And for everyone who have the same problem, here is a workaround. Declare a
template class with a dummy argument (int in this case), partial specialize
this class and derive from the partial specialized
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-15 14:51
---
> ... Why?
> Because the standard says so, there is no other reason (in other words, there
> is no reason at all).
I'm sorry, why this attitud
--- Additional Comments From sven at clio dot in-berlin dot de 2005-05-15
17:46 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> > ...
Why?
> > Because the standard says so, there is no other reason (in other words,
there
> > is n
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-15
17:54 ---
Let me say this, the standard is needed otherwise, there is no language
defined as C, just like there
phython is not really defined.
Oh, and people who write GCC are both on the C and C++ ISO committees.
--- Additional Comments From sven at clio dot in-berlin dot de 2005-05-15
17:58 ---
This is the last try. First I wonder who has invented the strange syntax for
defining template member classes outside. C++ is still an imperative
programming language, not a functional. A straightforwar
--- Additional Comments From sven at clio dot in-berlin dot de 2005-05-15
18:20 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Let me say this, the standard is needed otherwise, there is no language
> defined as C, just like there phython is not really defined.
Did You know that You can not write
10 matches
Mail list logo
