--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-15 22:43
---
The claim in Comment #9 is that this is a 4.1 regression as well as a 4.0
regression, so I've udpated the subject line. It would be interesting to know
if this affects mainline as well.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From matz at suse dot de 2005-06-30 15:23 ---
Ah, I see. Note that you must compile the reduced testcase (thanks for
that) with -O0, or with -fno-inline, otherwise the A::A ctor will be inlined
in use.cc (making the warning about the non-availability of it even
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-30
15:10 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Yes which is why I did not confirm it yet because I did not look at fully. I
just added the diagnostic
keyword because it is still a wrong warning. I am adding wrong-code also.
R
--- Additional Comments From matz at suse dot de 2005-06-30 15:01 ---
Andrew: that's not a diagnostic issue. While the diagnostic (the warning)
indeed is wrong and misleading (and probably points to the underlying cause
of this issue), the actual error I'm complaining about is
the lin
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Summary|pragma |[4.0/4.1 Regression] pragma
|inte
