[Bug c++/22513] [4.0 regression] Miscompilation of std::list code in Boost.

2005-07-27 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-27 13:24 --- Testcase succeeds after a clean bootstrap. Hoorah! Thanks. Marking as a duplicate of bug 22591 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22591 *** -- What|Removed |

[Bug c++/22513] [4.0 regression] Miscompilation of std::list code in Boost.

2005-07-27 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-27 12:52 --- No, sorry I didn't. Bootstrapping now... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22513

[Bug c++/22513] [4.0 regression] Miscompilation of std::list code in Boost.

2005-07-27 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-27 12:25 --- Did you do a full bootstrap? A library function was miscompiled, so a just using a new compiler isn't enough. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22513

[Bug c++/22513] [4.0 regression] Miscompilation of std::list code in Boost.

2005-07-27 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-27 12:22 --- gcc version 4.0.2 20050727 (prerelease) still shows the problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22513

[Bug c++/22513] [4.0 regression] Miscompilation of std::list code in Boost.

2005-07-27 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-27 08:56 --- The fix for PR 22591 fixed a miscompilation of std::list::swap. Could you please try whether this also fixes this problem? -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/22513] [4.0 regression] Miscompilation of std::list code in Boost.

2005-07-19 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-19 13:53 --- Adding -check-initialization to MUDFLAP_OPTIONS I see a read of an uninitialized variable earlier in the program. This happens with both 4.0 and mainline. I'll try to identify that and see if fixing it affect

[Bug c++/22513] [4.0 regression] Miscompilation of std::list code in Boost.

2005-07-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-17 10:46 --- P.S. If I compile with -m32 I get 40 mudflap violations, but only one in 64-bit mode. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22513

[Bug c++/22513] [4.0 regression] Miscompilation of std::list code in Boost.

2005-07-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-17 10:00 --- With mainline I still get no error. With 4.0.2 I get some errors and then the final assertion is triggered (rather than a segfault) so using mudflap changes the behaviour of the program: g++40 -g -static ptr

[Bug c++/22513] [4.0 regression] Miscompilation of std::list code in Boost.

2005-07-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-16 19:47 --- With -fmudflap, I get errors (many of them but this is with i686-pc-linux): *** mudflap violation 1 (check/write): time=1121543018.141782 ptr=0xbfe049c0 size=4 pc=0xed9eb8 location=`/home/data/redi/gcc/

[Bug c++/22513] [4.0 regression] Miscompilation of std::list code in Boost.

2005-07-16 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-07-16 19:15 --- Might be latent in HEAD -- What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/22513] [4.0 regression] Miscompilation of std::list code in Boost.

2005-07-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-16 19:05 --- Created an attachment (id=9290) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9290&action=view) Pre-processed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22513