[Bug c++/23293] [3.4 Regression] Misleading names in diagnostics for typedefs in functions

2006-02-28 Thread gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 04:45 --- The fix for this problem is very "simple"; however, it drew a discussion that showed disagreement about the form of the type displayed in diagnostic. Consequently, it won't be fixed for 3.4.6. -- gdr at gcc dot gnu d

[Bug c++/23293] [3.4 Regression] Misleading names in diagnostics for typedefs in functions

2005-10-18 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-18 15:39 --- Fixed in 4.0.3. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summa

[Bug c++/23293] [3.4 Regression] Misleading names in diagnostics for typedefs in functions

2005-10-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.0.3 |3.4.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23293