--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-05
16:12 ---
Subject: Bug 23667
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-05 16:12:15
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog pt.c
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-05
16:13 ---
Subject: Bug 23667
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-05 16:13:03
Modified files:
gcc/cp :
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-05
16:15 ---
Fixed in 4.0.2.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-04 14:10
---
By the way, the error message I get with mainline (or current 4_0-branch):
reduced_2005_09_04.cc: In function 'int main()':
reduced_2005_09_04.cc:66: error: '(((int)X0::n_primes) == 256)' is not a valid
template
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-03
18:52 ---
Does anyone happen to have a smallish test-case for this one?
Obviously, I can build one of the affected toolchains, but if someone has a
cut-down test case handy, I'll take it. :-)
--
What
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-03
19:04 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Does anyone happen to have a smallish test-case for this one?
Obviously, I can build one of the affected toolchains, but if someone has a
cut-down test case handy, I'll take
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-09-03 20:08
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] tr1/6_containers/unordered/hashtable/23465.cc
execution test times out
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-03 23:06
---
(In reply to comment #14)
Yes, but that makes it no easier for me to test and debug the problem.
Hi, today I tried, quickly, but failed to find a simple testcase. Tomorrow,
I'll try again, harder. Thanks for
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-09-04 03:08
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] tr1/6_containers/unordered/hashtable/23465.cc
execution test times out
pcarlini at suse dot de wrote:
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-03
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-02
19:18 ---
I am thinking this was caused by the patch for PR c++/23099.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |c++
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-02
19:31 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I am thinking this was caused by the patch for PR c++/23099.
I should say how I came to this conclusion.
The only non front-end patches which changes code gen that went on
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-02 21:29
---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #6)
I am thinking this was caused by the patch for PR c++/23099.
I should say how I came to this conclusion.
...
Thanks a lot Andrew. Over the we I will
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-03 01:16
---
Ok, I can confirm that Andrew's guess, about the involvment of Mark's patch:
what is happening is that, inside hashtable::m_rehash, X0::n_primes == 0
whereas, at line 383 of tr1/hashtable we find:
templateint
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-03 01:31
---
Sorry about the typo: X0::n_primes is found wrongly equal to zero (instead of
256) inside prime_rehash_policy::need_rehash.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23667
15 matches
Mail list logo
