[Bug c++/23885] incorrect template two-stage name-lookup

2013-05-20 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23885 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/23885] incorrect template two-stage name-lookup

2012-10-12 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23885 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED

[Bug c++/23885] incorrect template two-stage name-lookup

2011-12-13 Thread rockeet at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23885 rockeet rockeet at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rockeet at gmail dot

[Bug c++/23885] incorrect template two-stage name-lookup

2011-12-13 Thread rockeet at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23885 --- Comment #10 from rockeet rockeet at gmail dot com 2011-12-13 09:38:45 UTC --- Sorry, missed output of g++ 4.6.0: Begin Output void f(A) void f(B) void f(B) void f(T) [with T = int] void f(T) [with T = int*] End Output

[Bug c++/23885] incorrect template two-stage name-lookup

2010-01-06 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-06 19:41 --- Suspending along with 16635. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/23885] incorrect template two-stage name-lookup

2007-05-31 Thread andrew dot stubbs at st dot com
--- Comment #7 from andrew dot stubbs at st dot com 2007-05-31 09:49 --- See here: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#197 It would appear that only koenig lookup is done for functions defined after the template declaration. As the Intel statement says, koenig

[Bug c++/23885] incorrect template two-stage name-lookup

2007-05-30 Thread fang at csl dot cornell dot edu
--- Comment #5 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-05-30 18:00 --- test case fails with 4.2.0 (release) test case works with 3.3.3 (x86 SuSE linux) test case fails with 3.3 (powerpc Apple's blds. 1760/1819) Yet 3.3.3 is currently listed under known to fail. The mixed results on

[Bug c++/23885] incorrect template two-stage name-lookup

2007-05-30 Thread martin dot audet at imi dot cnrc-nrc dot gc dot ca
--- Comment #6 from martin dot audet at imi dot cnrc-nrc dot gc dot ca 2007-05-30 21:02 --- I'm the original submiter of this bug and I'am not sure now if it's a bug in g++ template instantiation mechanism (e.g. problem with the two phase name lookup) or if the code example itself is

[Bug c++/23885] incorrect template two-stage name-lookup

2006-01-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-29 02:02 --- Confirmed, your 3.3.2 is redhat's and I don't trust it enough to consider this a regression. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/23885] incorrect template two-stage name-lookup

2005-10-01 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23885

[Bug c++/23885] incorrect template two-stage name-lookup

2005-09-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet|i386-redhat-linux and | |x86_64-redhat-linux | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23885

[Bug c++/23885] incorrect template two-stage name-lookup

2005-09-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-14 19:03 --- I think this is a dup of bug 16635. -- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|

[Bug c++/23885] incorrect template two-stage name-lookup

2005-09-14 Thread martin dot audet at imi dot cnrc-nrc dot gc dot ca
--- Additional Comments From martin dot audet at imi dot cnrc-nrc dot gc dot ca 2005-09-14 20:36 --- Hi again, I agree with you, this bug and 16635 seems to be related to the same cause (which is I guess the two-stage name-lookup for templates). I also ran the three code examples

[Bug c++/23885] incorrect template two-stage name-lookup

2005-09-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-14 20:41 --- It fails on 3.3.3 also. -- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|4.0.1 4.0.0 3.4.3 3.4.2