--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 22:29 ---
Subject: Bug 24745
Author: manu
Date: Tue Jan 30 22:29:11 2007
New Revision: 121361
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121361
Log:
2007-01-30 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 23:13 ---
Fixed for 4.3.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-20 09:25 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/24745
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01657.html
--
--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 15:15 ---
Maybe we shouldn't show any warning when converting NULL to boolean. Perhaps in
time for the new Wconversion option...
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org 2006-01-24
18:35 ---
But still an unpleasant behavior :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24745
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 17:49 ---
Confirmed, not a regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 23:24 ---
Hmm, all of these warnings were present before 4.0.0.
The only warning that is a regression is the second:
argument to non-pointer type `bool' from NULL warning which did not warn in
3.3.3 and before but does in
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 23:24 ---
Oh and the first argument to non-pointer type `bool' from NULL was new in
3.0.x and above and did not show up in 2.95.3.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 23:40 ---
*** Bug 24746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24745
