--- Comment #7 from sela_lerer at hotmail dot com 2005-12-16 18:00 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Ok, but what about an inner class? If A had a public inner class B and the
> > outer function had to operate on it?
>
>
> The code is still invalid. Just ther
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 16:43 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Ok, but what about an inner class? If A had a public inner class B and the
> outer function had to operate on it?
The code is still invalid. Just there is no simple work around except sp
--- Comment #5 from sela_lerer at hotmail dot com 2005-12-15 16:38 ---
Ok, but what about an inner class? If A had a public inner class B and the
outer function had to operate on it?
--
sela_lerer at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from sela_lerer at hotmail dot com 2005-12-15 16:36 ---
Ok, but what about an inner class? If A had a public inner class B and the
outer function had to operate on it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25427
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 16:23 ---
This is invalid code, Comeau gives the following error:
"ComeauTest.c", line 12: error: the global scope has no "operator<<"
friend std::ostream & :: operator<<(std::ostream &os,A
&a);
--- Comment #2 from sela_lerer at hotmail dot com 2005-12-15 14:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=10495)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10495&action=view)
g++ preprocessed file.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25427
--- Comment #1 from sela_lerer at hotmail dot com 2005-12-15 14:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=10494)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10494&action=view)
The source file that produced the error.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25427
