--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 05:25 ---
Janis,
Could you do a regression hunt on this bug?
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 21:03 ---
A regression hunt on powerpc-linux identified this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=110017
r110017 | mmitchel | 2006-01-20 03:07:58 + (Fri, 20 Jan 2006)
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org c
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 01:15 ---
Subject: Bug 26102
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 6 01:15:09 2006
New Revision: 116709
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116709
Log:
PR c++/26102
* name-lookup.c (do_class_using_decl
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 01:15 ---
Subject: Bug 26102
Author: jason
Date: Wed Sep 6 01:15:39 2006
New Revision: 116710
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116710
Log:
PR c++/26102
* name-lookup.c (do_class_using_decl
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:33
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-05 14:50 ---
Worked on 20051217 but fails on 20060127.
Fails also in "4.1.0 20060130"
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 09:13
---
One could argue that this should be P1, but I'm going to make it P1, since the
valid code that is incorrectly rejected is somewhat obscure.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Remov
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
