--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 21:39
---
Subject: Bug 26122
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed May 17 21:39:07 2006
New Revision: 113873
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113873
Log:
PR c++/26122
* decl2.c
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 23:00
---
Subject: Bug 26122
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Apr 11 22:59:57 2006
New Revision: 112869
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112869
Log:
* g++.dg/parse/dtor7.C: New test.
*
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-12 01:18
---
Subject: Bug 26122
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed Apr 12 01:18:06 2006
New Revision: 112879
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=112879
Log:
PR c++/26122
* parser.c
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-12 01:19
---
The ICE is now fixed.
I'm not sure if the failure to diagnose the fact that a non-virtual function
has a pure specifier in a template class is a regression or not.
--
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:26
---
This issue will not be resolved in GCC 4.1.0; retargeted at GCC 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 09:51
---
The reason that the first and last examples are accepted is that, were there
dependent base classes, we would have no way of knowing whether or not those
base classes might declare a virtual function for which
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26122
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-06 12:46 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-06 15:14
---
Btw, we also fail to diagnose the following invalid code snippet:
=
templateint struct A
{
void foo() = 0;
};
=
--
