[Bug c++/26696] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with statement forming unused static member function reference

2006-09-09 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-09 10:47 --- The problem from comment #10 is now tracked in PR 28996. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26696

[Bug c++/26696] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with statement forming unused static member function reference

2006-09-08 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 23:33 --- The fix is incomplete. The following testcase still fails: == struct A { static void foo(); }; void bar() { A().foo; } == -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot

[Bug c++/26696] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with statement forming unused static member function reference

2006-09-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-08 23:45 --- (In reply to comment #10) The fix is incomplete. The following testcase still fails: Can you file a new bug report since the orginal testcase here was fixed, even though your testcase is very closely related it

[Bug c++/26696] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with statement forming unused static member function reference

2006-09-06 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 17:06 --- Subject: Bug 26696 Author: jason Date: Wed Sep 6 17:06:00 2006 New Revision: 116724 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116724 Log: PR c++/26696 * cvt.c (convert_to_void): Replace a

[Bug c++/26696] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with statement forming unused static member function reference

2006-09-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug c++/26696] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with statement forming unused static member function reference

2006-07-05 Thread dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-07-05 10:46 --- fix we need to check first operand for FIELD_DECL before gimpilfying COMPONENT_REF this is a wrong fix, it caused some regressions -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26696

[Bug c++/26696] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with statement forming unused static member function reference

2006-07-05 Thread dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-07-05 18:26 --- It should instead issue the warning statement is a reference, not call, to function A::f gcc producing the warnig, if you using -Wall flag -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26696

[Bug c++/26696] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with statement forming unused static member function reference

2006-06-29 Thread dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-06-30 01:08 --- Created an attachment (id=11782) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11782action=view) fix we need to check first operand for FIELD_DECL before gimpilfying COMPONENT_REF --

[Bug c++/26696] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with statement forming unused static member function reference

2006-06-04 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26696

[Bug c++/26696] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with statement forming unused static member function reference

2006-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 14:16 --- Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/26696] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with statement forming unused static member function reference

2006-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 14:17 --- Here is the ICE when checking is enabled: t.cc:9: internal compiler error: tree check: expected field_decl, have baselink in component_ref_field_offset, at expr.c:5757 --