This code:
struct D {
D() {}
virtual ~D() {}
void operator delete(void*, void*) {}
};
void f() { D d(); }
is rejected with "no suitable 'operator delete' for 'D'".
It is true that the placement deallocation function hides any
"usual" one, but surely it is only necessary for a usual one to
be found when implementing a delete-expression, as described
in 12.5#4. This code is accepted by Comeau and HP aC++ (but
faulted by Sun C++ with a similar error to g++).
--
Summary: Unexpected requirement for usual deallocation function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: algrant at acm dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27141
