--- Comment #1 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-05-26 15:08 ---
Confirmed.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #2 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-05-28 18:58 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> I'm not quite sure whether writing "class" before "A::B::C" is valid
> or has to be replaced by "typename".
This is the subject of DR 180.
W.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27665
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27665
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-15 00:06
---
The problem here is with the parser optimization by which the results of
parsing a nested-name-specifier is cached, even if the parser backs up. Here,
we consider that "class A::B::C" might be a class-head. In th
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-15 03:51
---
Subject: Bug 27665
Author: mmitchel
Date: Thu Jun 15 03:51:51 2006
New Revision: 114669
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114669
Log:
PR c++/27665
* parser.c (cp_parser_unquali
