https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27775
--- Comment #5 from Rich Newman ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #4)
> Clang 3.0 also reject this, so I am not sure whether is actually valid, but
> the repeated messages are suspicious.
>
EDG accepts it, and I can see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27775
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27775
Rich Newman rnewman at compubrite dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.0.0 |4.5.1
--- Comment #2 from kristian dot spangsege at gmail dot com 2008-08-10
09:49 ---
I just confirmed this bug in GCC 4.3.0.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27775
--- Comment #1 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-08-06 22:19 ---
Confirmed. To make things worse, the diagnostic is really longish
right now as well:
g/x c++ -c x.cc
x.cc:10: error: reference to 'B' is ambiguous
x.cc:4: error: candidates are: struct A::B
x.cc:4: error:
