--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-19 05:15
---
Subject: Bug 28048
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed Jul 19 05:14:25 2006
New Revision: 115579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=115579
Log:
PR c++/28048
* semantics.c
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28048
--- Comment #2 from gcc dot gnu dot org at chosenones dot dyndns dot org
2006-06-16 12:59 ---
I'm not entirely sure myself, but:
Section 14.6.7
When looking for the declaration of a name used in a template function
definition or static data member template definition, the usual lookup
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-16 17:43 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Looks invalid, as I think default arguments need to be bound immediately(?)
No they don't, if they did then all of STL with allocators would be broken :).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
