[Bug c++/28301] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE with broken specialization

2009-04-10 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-10 18:56 --- Subject: Bug 28301 Author: hjl Date: Fri Apr 10 18:56:07 2009 New Revision: 145936 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=145936 Log: gcc/cp/ 2009-04-10 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com PR

[Bug c++/28301] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE with broken specialization

2009-04-10 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-10 19:01 --- Subject: Bug 28301 Author: hjl Date: Fri Apr 10 19:01:16 2009 New Revision: 145938 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=145938 Log: gcc/cp/ 2009-04-10 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com Backport

[Bug c++/28301] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE with broken specialization

2009-04-10 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-10 19:36 --- Subject: Bug 28301 Author: hjl Date: Fri Apr 10 19:36:19 2009 New Revision: 145939 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=145939 Log: gcc/cp/ 2009-04-10 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com Backport

[Bug c++/28301] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE with broken specialization

2009-04-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-10 19:37 --- Fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/28301] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE with broken specialization

2009-03-28 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-28 21:40 --- The bug reappeared on the trunk and the 4.3 branch. This was caused by 2009-03-18 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com PR c++/39425 * parser.c (cp_parser_explicit_specialization): Don't skip the

[Bug c++/28301] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE with broken specialization

2009-03-28 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-03-28 21:56 --- Even if a bug is fixed by another patch for a different bug, the testcase should be added to gcc. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28301