--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 21:22 ---
I thought it would simply be a matter of using TREE_NO_WARNING ... until I
realized this was not a warning but an error.
Anyway, following the method of the fix for PR19375, I bootstrapped and tested
this patch below
--- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-10 06:48 ---
I'll look into this.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assigned
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29048
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-12 22:32 ---
Related to PR 19375.
Confirmed, a regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---