--- Comment #6 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 18:41 ---
This bug might be a duplicate as you suggest but (my fault for opening new
instead of updating original) it is not 'resolved'. On the original post you
said to report to binutils because you suggested the bug was not in the
--- Comment #5 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 18:27 ---
Subject: Re: bad relocation section name `' in .o causes segv of ld.
Look, I am not trying to be a jerk, but this new filing has a test
case associated with it (another thing that you asked for). In
addition, I took your
--- Comment #4 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 18:23 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Didn't I already tell you to post this to binutils?
>
yes you did and I did what you asked. However, I now believe that the problem
is with the compiler. I also came up with a test case that demo
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-05 18:19 ---
Didn't I already tell you to post this to binutils?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29359
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-05 18:18 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29244 ***
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29244 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Adde
--- Comment #1 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-10-05 18:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=12385)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12385&action=view)
gzip'd tar file with README that shows how to reproduce
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29359
