--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 01:49 ---
I think this is a dup of bug 28169.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29437
--- Comment #2 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-10-12 01:52 ---
It is infact: this is a cleaned up version of that PR, but actually handles
the thing that is wrong, whereas PR 28169 was talking about something that
wasn't a bug at all.
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #3 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-10-12 02:06 ---
Forget this, the type of the rhs is of course an rvalue of type Base,
there is no need to copy the entire Derived object.
W.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What|Removed |A
--- Comment #4 from joseph dot rajesh at gmail dot com 2006-10-12 12:10
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Forget this, the type of the rhs is of course an rvalue of type Base,
> there is no need to copy the entire Derived object.
>
> W.
>
Hi,
I was pointing to the same error. But I thi
