[Bug c++/29518] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] rejects valid template argument, enums vs templates

2006-11-13 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 17:48 --- Subject: Bug 29518 Author: mmitchel Date: Mon Nov 13 17:48:28 2006 New Revision: 118767 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=118767 Log: PR c++/29518 * pt.c

[Bug c++/29518] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] rejects valid template argument, enums vs templates

2006-11-13 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 17:49 --- Subject: Bug 29518 Author: mmitchel Date: Mon Nov 13 17:49:43 2006 New Revision: 118768 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=118768 Log: PR c++/29518 * pt.c

[Bug c++/29518] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] rejects valid template argument, enums vs templates

2006-11-12 Thread news at derived-software dot ltd dot uk
--- Comment #12 from news at derived-software dot ltd dot uk 2006-11-12 11:04 --- From Aleksey Gurtovoy (co-author Boost.MPL): [wrt to this bug] Actually, no, enums in the bug's subject and reduced test case are a red herring. For example, this still fails for me on 4.1.1: template

[Bug c++/29518] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] rejects valid template argument, enums vs templates

2006-11-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-12 16:43 --- (In reply to comment #12) From Aleksey Gurtovoy (co-author Boost.MPL): [wrt to this bug] Actually, no, enums in the bug's subject and reduced test case are a red herring. For example, this still fails for me

[Bug c++/29518] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] rejects valid template argument, enums vs templates

2006-11-12 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com |dot org

[Bug c++/29518] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] rejects valid template argument, enums vs templates

2006-11-01 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29518