--- Comment #13 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-21 16:32 ---
Bugs waiting for the committee should not be release-critical; we can restore
this to P3 and reconsider the priority when unsuspending.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29607
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfir
--- Comment #12 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-16 23:19 ---
If we are waiting for a DR, this PR should be SUSPENDED, not WAITING.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29607
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 03:38
---
I am going to put these DR 224 issues into WAITING. I don't think we really
know what the committee is going to do yet.
(Prior to that DR being put into the WP, I had a long discussion with John
Spicer. My feel