[Bug c++/30839] [4.3 Regression] tree check fail for legal code

2007-04-09 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-09 14:52 --- Fixed on mainline by Sandra's patch (revision 122411). -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/30839] [4.3 Regression] tree check fail for legal code

2007-02-18 Thread sandra at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #5 from sandra at codesourcery dot com 2007-02-18 22:37 --- This bug is fixed by this already-posted patch, which does some restructuring of the code in build_op_delete_call where the error is happening: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01487.html I could come u

[Bug c++/30839] [4.3 Regression] tree check fail for legal code

2007-02-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-18 22:04 --- Reduced testcase: typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t; inline void* operator new(size_t, void* __p) throw() { return __p; } inline void operator delete (void*, void*) throw() { } struct saved_extra_block { saved_extra_bl

[Bug c++/30839] [4.3 Regression] tree check fail for legal code

2007-02-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-18 21:50 --- Note this is related to placement new in a template. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30839

[Bug c++/30839] [4.3 Regression] tree check fail for legal code

2007-02-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-18 21:49 --- reducing ... -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|