--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-01-24 17:36 ---
Excellent, indeed. I also checked stock 4.2.1 and current 4_2-branch.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-24 17:18 ---
I have verified that all three of simon's test cases now error on mainline, as
expected. Hurray!!! So, this can be closed as fixed, I guess.
Note 4.1.2 also errors, so maybe this was a result of some temporary
fluctua
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-01-24 16:42 ---
Benjamin, can you have a look to the resolution of DR 259:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#259
I believe Simon is basically right...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30857
--- Comment #2 from simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-23 19:49
---
I've done tests with the current mainline and I wonder if this PR is still
"valid"...
We report an error for the following three cases:
1. Multiple specializations:
template class A {};
template<> class A
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30857
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30857
--- Comment #1 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-03-09 04:20 ---
We got a warning in gcc2.95, but it has apparently already disappeared in
gcc3.2.x.
W.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
