[Bug c++/31923] g++ accepts a storage-class-specifier on a template explicit specialization

2008-05-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31923

[Bug c++/31923] g++ accepts a storage-class-specifier on a template explicit specialization

2007-06-25 Thread simon_baldwin at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #5 from simon_baldwin at yahoo dot com 2007-06-25 17:24 --- Indeed it can -- thanks for the reminder. Marking as FIXED. -- simon_baldwin at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/31923] g++ accepts a storage-class-specifier on a template explicit specialization

2007-06-23 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-23 19:52 --- As this patch has been checked in, can this PR be closed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31923

[Bug c++/31923] g++ accepts a storage-class-specifier on a template explicit specialization

2007-06-18 Thread simonb at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from simonb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-18 22:09 --- Subject: Bug 31923 Author: simonb Date: Mon Jun 18 22:09:14 2007 New Revision: 125829 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=125829 Log: gcc/cp/ChangeLog 2007-06-15 Simon Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug c++/31923] g++ accepts a storage-class-specifier on a template explicit specialization

2007-06-14 Thread simon_baldwin at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #2 from simon_baldwin at yahoo dot com 2007-06-14 21:29 --- Note: there's also a C++ language defect report relating to this issue, with recommendation from the CWG: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#605 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug c++/31923] g++ accepts a storage-class-specifier on a template explicit specialization

2007-05-29 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #1 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-05-29 22:54 --- Subject: Bug number PR c++/31923 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg02033.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil