--- Comment #9 from dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-18 22:15 ---
Fixed on the trunk
--
dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #8 from dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-18 21:19 ---
Subject: Bug 33943
Author: dgregor
Date: Tue Dec 18 21:19:41 2007
New Revision: 131041
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131041
Log:
2007-12-18 Douglas Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
J
--- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-12-16 21:57 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Also another thing is that
> we have some ODR violations in libstdc++ that the libstdc++ folks have not
> replied to me about yet.
Because such a thing doesn't exist. If the user wants to experim
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-16 21:27 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I disagree with Andrew's Comment #4. Once we implement a feature in the
> compiler, users should reasonably expect it to be correct. We cannot
> simultaneously say "Look, we have exciting
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-16 21:11
---
I disagree with Andrew's Comment #4. Once we implement a feature in the
compiler, users should reasonably expect it to be correct. We cannot
simultaneously say "Look, we have exciting new C++0x features!" and "Oh
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-15 12:13 ---
The code is still invalid C++98 so the regression is still just an error
recovery issue :).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #3 from dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-15 08:31 ---
This is valid code, so it's more serious than we thought.
--
dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-02 21:03 ---
Mark, this is really only an error recovery regression. Can you relook at the
current priority?
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33943
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 05:03 ---
Confirmed, the ICE is an error recovery regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
10 matches
Mail list logo