--- Comment #6 from dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-15 16:09 ---
Fixed on mainline
--
dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-15 16:10 ---
Subject: Bug 33964
Author: dgregor
Date: Tue Jan 15 16:09:28 2008
New Revision: 131544
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131544
Log:
2008-01-15 Douglas Gregor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #5 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2008-01-12 19:06 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg00482.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33964
--- Comment #4 from dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-11 14:11 ---
This code is ill-formed, and should be rejected because Args cannot be
deduced from typename Args::is_applied. Interestingly enough, this problem
actually has nothing to do with variadic templates: take away the
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-01-09 00:05 ---
Doug, can you confirm the code is legal? Because the ICE disappeared and now
just compiles...
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-02 21:03 ---
Mark, this is really only an error recovery regression. Can you relook at the
current priority?
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33964
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:44 ---
Confirmed, the ICE is an error recovery regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
