[Bug c++/34023] Wrong using of user-defined conversion operator for converting rvalue to reference on constant.

2011-09-25 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34023 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/34023] Wrong using of user-defined conversion operator for converting rvalue to reference on constant.

2007-11-28 Thread sergey dot gcc at comrades dot id dot au
--- Comment #5 from sergey dot gcc at comrades dot id dot au 2007-11-29 00:04 --- (In reply to comment #3) // Workaround: class a { public: templateclass T operator T () const throw(typename ::boost::disable_if

[Bug c++/34023] Wrong using of user-defined conversion operator for converting rvalue to reference on constant.

2007-11-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-19 04:15 --- This works on the trunk. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/34023] Wrong using of user-defined conversion operator for converting rvalue to reference on constant.

2007-11-08 Thread sergey dot gcc at comrades dot id dot au
--- Comment #3 from sergey dot gcc at comrades dot id dot au 2007-11-09 01:14 --- // Workaround: class a { public: templateclass T operator T () const throw(typename ::boost::disable_if ::boost::is_sameT, ref_t const ::type *)

[Bug c++/34023] Wrong using of user-defined conversion operator for converting rvalue to reference on constant.

2007-11-07 Thread sergey dot gcc at comrades dot id dot au
--- Comment #2 from sergey dot gcc at comrades dot id dot au 2007-11-08 02:03 --- (In reply to comment #1) I've checked other versions of compiler, such as 3.4.6 and 4.X.X. Can someone check? Sorry, I mean, I have *NOT*. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34023

[Bug c++/34023] Wrong using of user-defined conversion operator for converting rvalue to reference on constant.

2007-11-07 Thread sergey dot gcc at comrades dot id dot au
--- Comment #1 from sergey dot gcc at comrades dot id dot au 2007-11-08 01:58 --- I've checked other versions of compiler, such as 3.4.6 and 4.X.X. Can someone check? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34023