--- Comment #10 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-20 16:36 ---
Subject: Bug 35158
Author: manu
Date: Wed Aug 20 16:35:21 2008
New Revision: 139335
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=139335
Log:
2008-08-20 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #11 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-20 16:38 ---
Fixed in GCC 4.4
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-11 13:14 ---
To answer c#7, that's what would (and does) happen for autoparallelization.
But OpenMP is explicit parallelization, if you don't preceede for (...; ...;
...) ... construct with #pragma omp {,parallel } for, nothing
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-10 21:46 ---
This is invalid OpenMP code.
See 2.5.1 (in OpenMP 3.0, similar wording is in 2.5 standard too):
init-expr One of the following:
var = lb
integer-type var = lb
--- Comment #5 from danny dot dyk at tu-dortmund dot de 2008-08-10 22:17
---
That means - contrary to popular knowledge - that OpenMP is not C++ compatible.
Fair enough! Just don't announce it as such, then.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35158
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-10 22:28 ---
No idea how do you infer that from this.
If you use #pragma omp for before a loop construct, there are many restrictions
you need to honor to have a valid OpenMP program, this is just one of them.
To list just some
--- Comment #7 from danny dot dyk at tu-dortmund dot de 2008-08-10 22:49
---
Applicable to a subset of C++ doesn't equal C++ compatibility.
I'm fine with OpenMP unable to successfully parallelise a majority of possible
for loops. It's quite understandable. However, instead of throwing
--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-10 22:50 ---
A patch was posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg00442.html
(I miss the patch tracker!!!)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35158
--- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 20:14 ---
Reconfirmed in GCC 4.4
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 22:26 ---
CC Jakub,
Is this initialization allowed in OpenMP or not? I have a patch that handles
it, so we can either allow it or we can give an error such:
error: parenthesized initialization not allowed in OpenMP for
--
--- Comment #1 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 22:10 ---
Confirmed in GCC 4.3 revision 132291.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
11 matches
Mail list logo
