[Bug c++/38087] Pseudo destructor call

2017-08-17 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug c++/38087] Pseudo destructor call

2017-08-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug c++/38087] Pseudo destructor call

2017-08-14 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/38087] Pseudo destructor call

2008-11-12 Thread mrs at apple dot com
--- Comment #3 from mrs at apple dot com 2008-11-12 18:33 --- I'm merely eching bits from the clang development list... Now they think the above doesn't apply, but 3.4.5p3 does: 3 If the unquali#64257;ed-id is #8764; type-name, the type-name is looked up in the context of the entire

[Bug c++/38087] Pseudo destructor call

2008-11-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-12 00:32 --- I still think this is valid code ... There are defect reports against this area too. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087

[Bug c++/38087] Pseudo destructor call

2008-11-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-12 00:35 --- See PR 12333 also. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087