--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-02-11 17:52
---
Paolo, should this be assigned to you?
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-02-11 18:59 ---
hm if i didn't look at it so far, i guess no. :-( but if i have time i will
look at it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38228
--- Comment #4 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-01-31 15:33 ---
I'll take a look at it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38228
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38228
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-28 23:43
---
Simpler testcase:
===
struct A
{
templatetypename T A(T);
};
struct B
{
void foo();
};
A a = B().*(B::foo);
===
This is invalid use of a bound
