http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38928
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-02-02 10:19
---
Ok Mark, agreed, thanks. For the moment, I'm not going to work on this one and
I'm unassigning myself in order not to prevent anyone else quicker than me...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-02 06:41
---
Yes, designated initializers are of course a GNU extension to C++. I'm
surprised that icc accepts them in its strict mode.
In GNU C++, it makes sense for us to accept the same extensions that are
accepted in GNU
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-01-30 10:18
---
The diagnostic issue is trivial, just add a check for error_mark_node on the
return value of reshape_init_r, consistently with other calls.
However, I'm still analyzing whether we really want to reject. As
--- Comment #5 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-01-30 15:00 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
However, I'm still analyzing whether we really want to reject. As data points,
ICC doesn't, even in strict mode; on the other hand Comeau rejects the
identifier family already...
Does it
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-01-30 01:43
---
On it.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-22 01:41 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-22 01:41 ---
3.3 ICEd on the testcase.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
