[Bug c++/39055] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE with questionable default parameter of a member function

2009-11-13 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 16:16 --- Bumping down the priority since it doesn't ICE on 4.4+ and it's unclear whether or not the code should be valid. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/39055] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE with questionable default parameter of a member function

2009-11-12 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-12 22:47 --- Created an attachment (id=19007) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19007action=view) patch This patch makes G++ reject the testcase. But I don't see the utility in rejecting it, and since EDG also

[Bug c++/39055] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE with questionable default parameter of a member function

2009-07-18 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-18 11:26 --- GCC's history with this code is: * GCC 2.95.3 rejects * GCC 3.0 - 3.2.3 accepts * GCC 3.3 - 3.3.6 rejects * GCC 3.4.0 - 4.3.x crashes * GCC 4.4.0 - trunk accepts Without the template, only

[Bug c++/39055] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE with questionable default parameter of a member function

2009-07-18 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-18 11:37 --- But 'this' is local to the function as well, so I think the wording about 'this' can be interpreted in the light of the local variable wording to mean that the testcase is ill-formed. If, however, implementations

[Bug c++/39055] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE with questionable default parameter of a member function

2009-03-31 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 21:08 --- Closing 4.2 branch. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added