--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-24 10:03 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-24 09:56 ---
Subject: Bug 41094
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 24 09:56:30 2009
New Revision: 151052
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151052
Log:
2009-08-24 Richard Guenther
PR middle-end/41094
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-24 09:52 ---
Subject: Bug 41094
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 24 09:52:03 2009
New Revision: 151051
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151051
Log:
2009-08-24 Richard Guenther
PR middle-end/41094
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-18 13:40 ---
Subject: Bug 41094
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Aug 18 13:40:18 2009
New Revision: 150874
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150874
Log:
2009-08-18 Richard Guenther
PR middle-end/41094
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-18 09:20 ---
Looks like a bug in fold.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
A
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-08-17 18:38
---
Note, this isn't C++ specific:
int main()
{
double x = -10.0;
__builtin_printf("%g\n", __builtin_pow(x * x, 0.25));
}
Richard, can you have a look? It's hot here ;) but first blush I don't see why
fast-ma
