[Bug c++/43075] 20_util/bind/ref2.cc FAILs

2010-02-17 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-17 17:51 --- IIUC, this is not a regression. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/43075] 20_util/bind/ref2.cc FAILs

2010-02-17 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #11 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-02-17 17:57 --- Mark, with your permission, I'm restoring P3: indeed, strictly speaking the failure of that specific testcase isn't a regression, because it didn't exist in gcc4.4.x, but I understand it uncovered a rather