[Bug c++/43352] keyword 'and' defined when even in the absence of iso646

2010-03-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-13 04:37 --- Use -fno-operator-names if you want these keywords not to be keywords in C++. Closing as invalid because these are keywords in C++. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/43352] keyword 'and' defined when even in the absence of iso646

2010-03-12 Thread mdjones0978-gcc at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #3 from mdjones0978-gcc at yahoo dot com 2010-03-13 03:59 --- g++ (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu9) 4.4.1 Linux 2.6.31-20-generic #57-Ubuntu SMP Mon Feb 8 09:05:19 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43352

[Bug c++/43352] keyword 'and' defined when even in the absence of iso646

2010-03-12 Thread pinskia at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-03-13 03:59 --- Subject: Re: New: keyword 'and' defined when even in the absence of iso646 Sent from my iPhone On Mar 12, 2010, at 7:54 PM, "mdjones0978-gcc at yahoo dot com" wrote: > = test.cpp == > #include > >

[Bug c++/43352] keyword 'and' defined when even in the absence of iso646

2010-03-12 Thread mdjones0978-gcc at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #1 from mdjones0978-gcc at yahoo dot com 2010-03-13 03:58 --- Created an attachment (id=20098) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20098&action=view) Example code compile with g++ test.cpp -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43352