[Bug c++/46224] Enhancement: Issue warning when matching placement delete operator is missing

2021-05-03 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46224 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2018-10-01 00:00:00 |2021-5-3 Blocks|87403

[Bug c++/46224] Enhancement: Issue warning when matching placement delete operator is missing

2019-02-03 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46224 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/46224] Enhancement: Issue warning when matching placement delete operator is missing

2017-09-26 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46224 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46224] Enhancement: Issue warning when matching placement delete operator is missing

2017-09-26 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46224 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/46224] Enhancement: Issue warning when matching placement delete operator is missing

2010-10-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46224 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/46224] Enhancement: Issue warning when matching placement delete operator is missing

2010-10-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46224 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-29 14:18:21 UTC --- Comeau has a similar warning. Here's a slightly smaller testcase that should produce a warning: #include cstddef #include new void* operator new(