http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-26
13:44:26 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu May 26 13:44:20 2011
New Revision: 174287
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174287
Log:
PR c++/48424
* decl.c (grokparms): Function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-26
13:22:54 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu May 26 13:22:51 2011
New Revision: 174285
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174285
Log:
PR c++/48424
* decl.c (grokparms): Function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-18
22:45:55 UTC ---
Yes, that looks OK too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-18
21:23:46 UTC ---
Jason, when this bug is fixed will this be allowed too?
template
struct S
{
template
void f(Args1... args1, Args2&&... args2)
{
}
};
S s;
Currently this gives:
var.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
