[Bug c++/48872] [C++0x][noexcept] Placement-new problem with non-empty arguments

2011-05-05 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48872 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2011-05-05 07:15:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) More information by a different example: It seems that the problem case reacts very sensitive to minor modifications of

[Bug c++/48872] [C++0x][noexcept] Placement-new problem with non-empty arguments

2011-05-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48872 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/48872] [C++0x][noexcept] Placement-new problem with non-empty arguments

2011-05-04 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48872 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2011-05-04 17:38:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) sigh an error happended when I tryied to transform my original example (using std::declval) to a form with a minimum of

[Bug c++/48872] [C++0x][noexcept] Placement-new problem with non-empty arguments

2011-05-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48872 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-04 17:53:25 UTC --- As I side remark, I'm not sure to understand why your testcases often include an 'int main { }' line, I don't think are about link-time problems, no? If

[Bug c++/48872] [C++0x][noexcept] Placement-new problem with non-empty arguments

2011-05-04 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48872 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2011-05-04 17:59:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) As I side remark, I'm not sure to understand why your testcases often include an 'int main { }' line, I don't think

[Bug c++/48872] [C++0x][noexcept] Placement-new problem with non-empty arguments

2011-05-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48872 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|