http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48930
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48930
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-10
17:58:49 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue May 10 17:58:46 2011
New Revision: 173628
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173628
Log:
PR c++/48930
* class.c (type_build_ctor_cal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48930
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48930
--- Comment #5 from Johannes Schaub
2011-05-09 10:55:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Indeed, C has no user-provided constructors, so it is an aggregate.
Jason, what about c1? It seems that it is default-initialized, which would want
to cal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48930
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48930
--- Comment #3 from Johannes Schaub
2011-05-08 22:02:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > I think it can be argued that this is a bug in the Standard rather than in
> > GCC.
> > The Standard says that members of C a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48930
--- Comment #2 from Johannes Schaub
2011-05-08 21:47:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I think it can be argued that this is a bug in the Standard rather than in
> GCC.
> The Standard says that members of C are zero initialized.
>
Let me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48930
Johannes Schaub changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schaub.johannes at
|
