http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-08
10:27:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
>
> Does the way I use an rvalue change it's definition?
I don't understand the question, I don't know what you mean by the definition
of an rvalue.
> So
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
--- Comment #7 from Hartmut Schirmer
2011-06-08 09:57:58 UTC ---
> > class A
> > {
> > public:
> > static const unsigned first = 1;
> > enum { second = 2 };
> > };
> >
> > should behave similar in all cases address of first isn't taken.
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-08
08:02:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > This is a dup of
>
> I think there are several hundred already. Not worth marking them as
> duplicate,
> it just further up
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
--- Comment #5 from Hartmut Schirmer
2011-06-08 05:25:44 UTC ---
> I think there are several hundred already.
Oh, this list was helpful, thanks!
> Not worth marking them as duplicate,
> it just further upsets people receiving notifications for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-07
15:57:43 UTC ---
This is a dup of
PR 10483
PR 13795
PR 13332
PR 13259
PR 44673
PR 42101
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
--- Comment #1 from Hartmut Schirmer
2011-06-07 14:11:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 24458
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24458
Small test case
Note bar() doesn't fail
Simple changes like
return direction==0 ? A::PEN+0 :
