http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390
Elias Pipping changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25266|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390
Elias Pipping changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25298|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390
Elias Pipping changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-16
09:44:21 UTC ---
your final version exits immediately using 4.6.1, but not with 4.5
although it might finish eventually I do think this can be considered a bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390
Elias Pipping changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390
--- Comment #6 from Elias Pipping 2011-09-16
22:08:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 25308
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25308
reduction for gcc 4.6.1
I used gcc 4.5 during reduction, assuming that a reduced test case would "ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|