http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51316
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51316
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-30 21:11:24 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Dec 30 21:11:20 2011
New Revision: 182746
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182746
Log:
/c-family
2011-12-30 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51316
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-12-28
22:31:02 UTC ---
Yeah, just allow the types at issue, that was clarified in core/930 actually.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51316
--- Comment #5 from Nikolka 2011-12-28 22:06:18 UTC ---
> On it.
There is an active core issue about alignof:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3309.html#1305
Probably, you should take into account the proposed resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51316
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51316
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-11-27 15:58:15 UTC ---
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011, tsoae at mail dot ru wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51316
>
> --- Comment #2 from Nikolka 2011-11-27 08:37:37 UTC ---
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51316
--- Comment #2 from Nikolka 2011-11-27 08:37:37 UTC ---
> Note that this usage is not valid in C1X.
Could you explain?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51316
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-11-26 23:11:11 UTC ---
Note that this usage is not valid in C1X.
