https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51553
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Jason, is this resolution definitely correct? Clang and EDG agree with GCC 4.6
here, and [over.best.ics] does seem relevant.
Maybe related, maybe not. G++ also rejects:
struct A {
explicit operator bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51553
--- Comment #6 from david.d.kretzmer at gmail dot com ---
Exactly. I first thought this is a bug in clang but then I saw this invalid bug
report: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17376
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51553
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
clang and EDG give errors for 1, 2, 3, 3a and 4, exactly as GCC used to.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51553
david.d.kretzmer at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.d.kretzmer at gm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51553
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51553
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-19
20:11:00 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Dec 19 20:10:49 2011
New Revision: 182496
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182496
Log:
PR c++/51553
* cp-tree.h (LOOKUP_LIST_INIT_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51553
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-19
20:10:45 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Dec 19 20:10:37 2011
New Revision: 182495
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182495
Log:
PR c++/51553
* call.c (add_function_candida
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51553
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|